Subject	ok. In that case i picture a scenario where it ran good..
Posted by	kickerzx on December 18, 2009 at 6:14 PM
	This message has been viewed 83 times.
In Reply To	Re: I see.. Well either i think you may have bad o2`s that posted by MaxxAction on December 18, 2009 at 06:09 PM
Message	.. but to rich and thus fouled the lambdas over the period of time you describe and now they read wrong causing a overly rich condition.
Follow Ups	Which System Faults will make the ECU take over the timing - MaxxAction 08:45:33 12/18/09 Did you do any work on the car before this happend? - kickerzx 13:40:16 12/18/09 BTW. The timing numbers change because - kickerzx 13:46:12 12/18/09 Re: BTW. The timing numbers change because - MaxxAction 15:00:21 12/18/09 Re: Did you do any work on the car before this happend? - MaxxAction 14:56:08 12/18/09 I agree with kickerzx ...... - zx299 15:27:03 12/18/09 I see.. Well either i think you may have bad o2`s that - kickerzx 17:30:15 12/18/09 Re: I see.. Well either i think you may have bad o2`s that - MaxxAction 18:09:01 12/18/09 ok. In that case i picture a scenario where it ran good.. - kickerzx 18:14:01 12/18/09 Which again leads me to a chip that dont fit your setup (n/m) - kickerzx 18:17:51 12/18/09 O2 sensors play NO part in idle..... - zx299 19:22:39 12/18/09 i don't disagree with you but can you please explain why - surfer31337 00:02:01 12/19/09 No thats not correct. O2`s DO play a role at idle. - kickerzx 05:50:38 12/19/09 Look at the pics of the maps on Ash`s site. - kickerzx 05:55:22 12/19/09 Incorrect....... - zx299 15:00:43 12/19/09 Hm. I am on the verge of giving you this one. - kickerzx 17:26:13 12/19/09
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.